Submission Deadline |
Notification of Acceptation |
Registration Deadline |
Conference Date |
October 22 2021 |
October 27 2021 |
November 5 2021 |
November 13-14 2021 |
Prospective authors are kindly encouraged to contribute to and help shape the conference through submissions of their research abstracts, papers and e-posters. Also, high quality research contributions describing original and unpublished results of conceptual, constructive, empirical, experimental, or theoretical work in all areas of Optics & Photonics are cordially invited for presentation at the conference. The conference solicits contributions of full papers and e-posters that address themes and topics of the conference, including figures, tables and references of novel research materials.
1. Submit your latest research paper via our Online Submission System.
2. Submit Full paper to aoprconf@163.com with Email Title as second choice, please also leave your phone number for communication.
Submission Deadline: October 22 2021
For example, "C-submission+Tel" or "Title+Tel". Authors are invited to submit your paper to online submission system.
"Please Note, Regular manuscript you submit to AOPR-2021 should not less than Six pages in length includes all firgures, equations, tables and references. Regular registration is within Six pages. Extra pages will be charge."
Article formats
Tutorial, Review Article, Research Article, Letter, Short Communication, Views
-Basically, Correct and Sound;
-Original; (MANUSCRIPT has not been published elsewhere or submitted to other venues for simultaneous consideration)
-At least Oneauthor of each manuscript should present at thIs conference;
-In line with the scope of AOPR conference.
-A maximum of Two manuscripts per author can be accepted.
-No more than Five authors per manuscript.
-Self-citations should not exceed 15 %.
-Authors are encouraged to refer to all aspects of publication ethics,We firmly believe that ethical conduct is the basic of any academic. Any act of Plagiarism or Academic misconduct is totally unacceptable and intolerated.
All reviews follow a double-blind process. All papers are subject to plagiarism analysis using a software tool prior to review.
All regular papers are reviewed by at least two reviewers, but usually by three or more, and rated considering their: Relevance, Originality, Technical Quality, Significance and Presentation;
The reviewers are also asked to answer a group of questions that may help the authors to improve the paper, should it be accepted, namely: Abstract and Introduction are adequate?, Needs more experimental results?, Needs comparative evaluation?, Improve critical discussion?, Figures are Adequate?, Conclusions/Future Work are convincing?, References are up-to-date and appropriate?, Paper formatting needs adjustment?, Improve English?
Finally, the reviewers can provide some free text observations which was given to the authors and also some free text private observations, made available only to the program chair. Conflicting reviews may require assignment of a new reviewer. In the end the program chairs decide. The author has a period for rebuttal, which triggers a workflow involving the chairs and the reviewers if necessary. All rebuttals are answered but decisions are final.